Difference between revisions of "Autonomy in the Corn Production System"

From MIT Technology Roadmapping
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
=Technology Roadmap Sections and Deliverables=
=Technology Roadmap Sections and Deliverables=


* '''2ACP - Autonomy in the Corn Production System'''
* '''2ACP – Autonomous Machines in the Corn Production System'''
This indicates that we are dealing with a “level 2” roadmap at the product level (see Fig. 8-5), where “level 1” would indicate a market level roadmap and “level 3” or “level 4” would indicate an individual technology roadmap.


Today’s farms are tasked with producing for a growing population with limited growth in key resources.  Heiko Rischer et. al. estimated projection of 60% higher global food requirements by 2050 with only a 2% expected increase in agricultural land (1).  This emphasizes the need for increased productivity per acre in today’s farming practices.  We plan to explore key enabling technologies related to this need.  Our intent is to look at the broad context of autonomous system benefits to the processes of agronomic decision making, data collection for decision making, and in-field execution of the selected farming practices.  While today’s farms are heavily dominated by productivity goals, the value autonomous machines present is to increase output by managing plant level outcomes while also reducing inputs in the form of labor, crop inputs, and capital.  We plan to generate a technology roadmap focused on autonomous in-field process execution that targets figures of merit related to field management resolution and operational costs.
(1)Heiko Rischer, Géza R Szilvay, Kirsi-Marja Oksman-Caldentey, Cellular agriculture — industrial biotechnology for food and materials, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Volume 61, 2020, Pages 128-134,
==Roadmap Overview==
==Roadmap Overview==


The working principle and architecture of solar-electric aircraft is depicted in the below.  
[[File:AutonomousFarm.jpg]]


The primary function of most agricultural machines is to manipulate soil, remove, transport, add commodity from the field, or assess crop or soil health.  Agricultural Autonomous Machines may exist in the form of aerial or ground vehicles, however the focus of this roadmap will be on ground vehicles.  These vehicles are typically constructed from steel or aluminum, carry on-board energy storage and crop commodities, are mounted on wheeled or track configurations, and powered by ICE (Internal Combustion Engines).  Given the portability and energy density of diesel fuel, the diesel engine dominates power generation in agriculture vehicles today.  Recent improvements in electrification and batteries have made this technology more appealing in lower power agriculture applications. 


The demands of each job step (Tilling, Planting, Nurturing, Protecting, Harvesting, Hauling) drive different operational capabilities to do the work and as such drive different implements to engage the soil or crop. For example, tilling requires greater tractive effort than planting and as such will require greater power and weight per unit of working width.  The versatility of the tractor, with its defined implement interface and high configurability, have made it the vehicle of choice for the tilling, planting, and hauling in-field job steps, whereas spraying field access and harvesting material handling requirements have driven unique machine forms.


Solar-electric aircraft are built from light-weight materials such as wood or carbon-fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) and harvest solar energy through the photoelectric effect by bonding thin film solar cells to the surface of the main wings, and potentially the fuselage and empennage as well. The electrical energy harvested during the day is then stored in on-board chemical batteries (e.g. Lithium-Ion, Lithium-Sulfur etc…) and used for propelling the aircraft at all times, including at night. For the system to work there needs to be an overproduction of energy during the day, so that the aircraft can use the stored energy to stay aloft at night. The flight altitude of about 60,000-70,000 feet is critical to stay above the clouds and not to interfere with commercial air traffic. Depending on the length of day, i.e. the diurnal cycle which determines the number of sunshine hours per day, which itself depends on the latitude and time-of-year (seasonality) the problem is easier or harder. The reference case in the technology roadmap is an equatorial mission (latitude = zero) with 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night.
Given that corn is planted in rows, the spacing between the row constrains the vehicle design. Additionally, environmental factors such as soil moisture and temperature, govern field access and timing of field operations.


==Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation==
==Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation==
Line 22: Line 27:


==Roadmap Model using OPM==
==Roadmap Model using OPM==
We provide an Object-Process-Diagram (OPD)  of the 2SEA roadmap in the figure below. This diagram captures the main object of the roadmap (Solar-Electric Aircraft), its various instances including main competitors, its decomposition into subsystems (wing, battery, e-motor …), its characterization by Figures of Merit (FOMs) as well as the main processes (Flying, Recharging).
Below is an Object-Process-Diagram (OPD)  of the 2ACP roadmap. The diagram provides an overview of the competitors, subsystems, key processes, and figures of merit making up the framework of an Autonomous Agricultural Ground Vehicle.


[[File:AAGV OPL.jpg|120px|thumb|right|Object Process Language]]


[[File:Autonomous Agricultural Ground Vehicle.jpeg]]


An Object-Process-Language (OPL) description of the roadmap scope is auto-generated and given below. It reflects the same content as the previous figure, but in a formal natural language.


Also provided is the Object-Process-Language (OPL) description of the roadmap, which describes textually the system functions, components, and Figures of Merit.  Of note, is job quality, which is dependent upon the specific task being completed.


==Figures of Merit==
==Figures of Merit==
Line 38: Line 45:


==Financial Model==
==Financial Model==
The figure below contains a sample NPV analysis underlying the 2SEA roadmap. It shows the non-recurring cost (NRC) of the product development project (PDP), which includes the R&D expenditures as negative numbers. A ramp up-period of  4 years is planned with a flat revenue plateau (of 400 million per year) and a total program duration of 24 years.


==List of R&T Projects and Prototypes==
==List of R&T Projects and Prototypes==
In order to select and prioritize R&D (R&T) projects we recommend using the technical and financial models developed as part of the roadmap to rank-order projects based on an objective set of criteria and analysis. The figure below illustrates how technical models are used to make technology project selections, e.g based on the previously stated 2030 target performance and Figure 8-17 (see the Chapter 8 of the text) shows the outcome if none of the three potential projects are selected.
A roadmap shows the R&T/R&D projects and demonstrators that have been (completed), are being (active) and could be (proposed) undertaken in order to progress the technology at the component or system level towards the set targets/goal set by the higher or lower-level roadmap. Please add what is essentially a Gantt Chart with milestones.


==Key Publications, Presentations and Patents==
==Key Publications, Presentations and Patents==
A good technology roadmap should contain a comprehensive list of publications, presentations and key patents as shown in Figure 8-19. This includes literature trends, papers published at key conferences and in the trade literature and trade press.


==Technology Strategy Statement==
==Technology Strategy Statement==
A technology roadmap should conclude and be summarized by both a written statement that summarizes the technology strategy coming out of the roadmap as well as a graphic that shows the key R&D investments, targets and a vision for this technology (and associated product or service) over time. For the 2SEA roadmap the statement could read as follows and is displayed in an Arrow Chart:

Latest revision as of 17:25, 11 October 2021

Page Under Development

Technology Roadmap Sections and Deliverables

  • 2ACP – Autonomous Machines in the Corn Production System

Today’s farms are tasked with producing for a growing population with limited growth in key resources. Heiko Rischer et. al. estimated projection of 60% higher global food requirements by 2050 with only a 2% expected increase in agricultural land (1). This emphasizes the need for increased productivity per acre in today’s farming practices. We plan to explore key enabling technologies related to this need. Our intent is to look at the broad context of autonomous system benefits to the processes of agronomic decision making, data collection for decision making, and in-field execution of the selected farming practices. While today’s farms are heavily dominated by productivity goals, the value autonomous machines present is to increase output by managing plant level outcomes while also reducing inputs in the form of labor, crop inputs, and capital. We plan to generate a technology roadmap focused on autonomous in-field process execution that targets figures of merit related to field management resolution and operational costs.

(1)Heiko Rischer, Géza R Szilvay, Kirsi-Marja Oksman-Caldentey, Cellular agriculture — industrial biotechnology for food and materials, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, Volume 61, 2020, Pages 128-134,

Roadmap Overview

AutonomousFarm.jpg

The primary function of most agricultural machines is to manipulate soil, remove, transport, add commodity from the field, or assess crop or soil health. Agricultural Autonomous Machines may exist in the form of aerial or ground vehicles, however the focus of this roadmap will be on ground vehicles. These vehicles are typically constructed from steel or aluminum, carry on-board energy storage and crop commodities, are mounted on wheeled or track configurations, and powered by ICE (Internal Combustion Engines). Given the portability and energy density of diesel fuel, the diesel engine dominates power generation in agriculture vehicles today. Recent improvements in electrification and batteries have made this technology more appealing in lower power agriculture applications.

The demands of each job step (Tilling, Planting, Nurturing, Protecting, Harvesting, Hauling) drive different operational capabilities to do the work and as such drive different implements to engage the soil or crop. For example, tilling requires greater tractive effort than planting and as such will require greater power and weight per unit of working width. The versatility of the tractor, with its defined implement interface and high configurability, have made it the vehicle of choice for the tilling, planting, and hauling in-field job steps, whereas spraying field access and harvesting material handling requirements have driven unique machine forms.

Given that corn is planted in rows, the spacing between the row constrains the vehicle design. Additionally, environmental factors such as soil moisture and temperature, govern field access and timing of field operations.

Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation

Section 2.JPG

The 2-SEA tree that we can extract from the DSM above shows us that the Solar-Electric Aircraft (2SEA) is part of a larger company-wide initiative on electrification of flight (1ELE), and that it requires the following key enabling technologies at the subsystem level: 3CFP Carbon Fiber Polymers, 3HEP Hybrid Electric Propulsion and 3EPS Non-Propulsive Energy Management (e.g. this includes the management of the charge-discharge cycle of the batteries during the day-night cycle). In turn these require enabling technologies at level 4, the technology component level: 4CMP components made from CFRP (spars, wing box, fairings …), 4EMT electric machines (motors and generators), 4ENS energy sources (such as thin film photovoltaics bonded to flight surfaces) and 4STO (energy storage in the form of lithium-type batteries).

Roadmap Model using OPM

Below is an Object-Process-Diagram (OPD) of the 2ACP roadmap. The diagram provides an overview of the competitors, subsystems, key processes, and figures of merit making up the framework of an Autonomous Agricultural Ground Vehicle.

Object Process Language

Autonomous Agricultural Ground Vehicle.jpeg


Also provided is the Object-Process-Language (OPL) description of the roadmap, which describes textually the system functions, components, and Figures of Merit. Of note, is job quality, which is dependent upon the specific task being completed.

Figures of Merit

Alignment with Company Strategic Drivers

Positioning of Company vs. Competition

Technical Model

Financial Model

List of R&T Projects and Prototypes

Key Publications, Presentations and Patents

Technology Strategy Statement