Difference between revisions of "User talk:SAF Brazil"

From MIT Technology Roadmapping
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 38: Line 38:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Figure of Merit !! Units !! Description
! Category !! Figure of Merit !! Units !! Description
|-
|-
| SAF unit cost || [USD/MJ] || Market cost of SAF per unit of volume or energy
| Competitiveness || SAF unit cost || [USD/MJ] || Market cost of SAF per unit of volume or energy
|-
|-
| Cost per reduced ton || [USD / tCO2e​] || Incremental cost per ton of carbon equivalent reduced vs CAF
| Competitiveness || Cost per reduced ton || [USD / tCO2e​] || Incremental cost per ton of carbon equivalent reduced vs CAF
|-
|-
| Investment potential || [USD / tCO2e​] || Financing opportunity per potential unit output of technology  
| Competitiveness || Investment potential || [USD / tCO2e​] || Financing opportunity per potential unit output of technology  
|-
|-
| Installation cost per unit || [USD / Vol] || Cost of deploying SAF production infrastructure relative to capability
| Competitiveness || Installation cost per unit || [USD / Vol] || Cost of deploying SAF production infrastructure relative to capability
|-
|-
| Energy efficiency || [%] || Energy input to produce SAF vs energy output in SAF
| Efficiency || Energy efficiency || [%] || Energy input to produce SAF vs energy output in SAF
|-
|-
| Feedstock crop yield || [Ton / ha] || Crop yield in volume produced per unit area
| Productivity || Feedstock crop yield || [Ton / ha] || Crop yield in volume produced per unit area
|-
|-
| Feedstock availability || [Ton / year] || Crop availability in volume produced per year
| Productivity || Feedstock availability || [Ton / year] || Crop availability in volume produced per year
|-
|-
| SAF conversion yield || [%] || SAF produced with relation to total refinery biofuel production
| Productivity || SAF conversion yield || [%] || SAF produced with relation to total refinery biofuel production
|-
|-
| Energy density || [MJ/Vol] || Energy content per unit volume of fuel
| Performance || Energy density || [MJ/Vol] || Energy content per unit volume of fuel
|-
|-
| Blend ratio of pathway/feedstock || [%] || Volume SAF relative to total volume of fuel after blend
| Performance || Blend ratio of pathway/feedstock || [%] || Volume SAF relative to total volume of fuel after blend
|-
|-
| Fuel consumption || [Vol/Time] || Fuel consumed per hour of flight to compare SAF vs CAF
| Performance || Fuel consumption || [Vol/Time] || Fuel consumed per hour of flight to compare SAF vs CAF
|-
|-
| Carbon savings potential || [tCO2e / MJ] || Potential reduction in emissions for use of SAF vs CAF as baseline
| Sustainability || Carbon savings potential || [tCO2e / MJ] || Potential reduction in emissions for use of SAF vs CAF as baseline
|-
|-
| Carbon emissions || [tCO2e / MJ] || Life-cycle carbon equivalent emissions to generate unit of fuel
| Sustainability || Carbon emissions || [tCO2e / MJ] || Life-cycle carbon equivalent emissions to generate unit of fuel
|-
|-
| Emission reduction factor || [%] || Percentage reduction per equivalent unit of use of SAF
| Sustainability || Emission reduction factor || [%] || Percentage reduction per equivalent unit of use of SAF
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 02:15, 7 October 2024

Roadmap Creators: Gabriel Ruscalleda, Emilia Ospina Arango and Dawit Dagnaw

Time Stamp: XX December 2024

Technology Roadmap Sections and Deliverables

Our technology roadmap identifier is shown as:

  • 3BSSAF - Brazil Solution - Sustainable Aviation Fuel

This indicates that we are dealing with a “level 3” roadmap at the product level, where “level 1” would indicate a market level roadmap, "level 2" would indicate our SAF Production and “level 3” or “level 4” would indicate an individual technology roadmap.

Roadmap Overview

(ADD OVERVIEW OF PROJECT)

Figure-2 SAF-roadmap.jpg


FeedstockClasification SAF.png 


Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation

(DESCRIBE THE DSM)

Roadmap Model using OPM

The Object-Process-Model (OPM) of the 2SAF - Sustainable Aviation Fuel roadmap is presented in the figure with the Object-Process-Language (OPL) below.

SAF OPD v1.jpeg


Figures of Merit

(ADD)


The table below shows a list of FOMs by which charging of electric vehicles can be quantified and compared

Category Figure of Merit Units Description
Competitiveness SAF unit cost [USD/MJ] Market cost of SAF per unit of volume or energy
Competitiveness Cost per reduced ton [USD / tCO2e​] Incremental cost per ton of carbon equivalent reduced vs CAF
Competitiveness Investment potential [USD / tCO2e​] Financing opportunity per potential unit output of technology
Competitiveness Installation cost per unit [USD / Vol] Cost of deploying SAF production infrastructure relative to capability
Efficiency Energy efficiency [%] Energy input to produce SAF vs energy output in SAF
Productivity Feedstock crop yield [Ton / ha] Crop yield in volume produced per unit area
Productivity Feedstock availability [Ton / year] Crop availability in volume produced per year
Productivity SAF conversion yield [%] SAF produced with relation to total refinery biofuel production
Performance Energy density [MJ/Vol] Energy content per unit volume of fuel
Performance Blend ratio of pathway/feedstock [%] Volume SAF relative to total volume of fuel after blend
Performance Fuel consumption [Vol/Time] Fuel consumed per hour of flight to compare SAF vs CAF
Sustainability Carbon savings potential [tCO2e / MJ] Potential reduction in emissions for use of SAF vs CAF as baseline
Sustainability Carbon emissions [tCO2e / MJ] Life-cycle carbon equivalent emissions to generate unit of fuel
Sustainability Emission reduction factor [%] Percentage reduction per equivalent unit of use of SAF


Alignment with Company Strategic Drivers

Positioning of Company vs. Competition

Technical Model

CO2-eq emission model


Fuel consumption model


Feedstock availability model


Technical model integration


Financial Model

List of R&D Projects

Key Publications, Presentations and Patents

Technology Strategy Statement

References

[1] Reference 1 [2] Reference 2