Difference between revisions of "In-Space Additive Manufacturing"

From MIT Technology Roadmapping
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:


[[Image:FOM_Image.PNG|center|1000px]]
[[Image:FOM_Image.PNG|center|1000px]]
Besides defining what the FOMs are, this section of the roadmap should also contain the FOM trends over time dFOM/dt as well as some of the key governing equations that underpin the technology. These governing equations can be derived from physics (or chemistry, biology ..) or they can be empirically derived from a multivariate regression model. The table below shows an example of a key governing equation governing (solar-) electric aircraft.
[[File:Section 4_2.JPG]]


==Alignment with Company Strategic Drivers==
==Alignment with Company Strategic Drivers==

Revision as of 14:44, 9 October 2019

Technology Roadmap Sections and Deliverables

The clear and unique identifier for this technology roadmap is:

  • 2ZGAM - Zero Gravity Additive Manufacturing

This indicates that we are dealing with a “level 2” roadmap at the specific implementation level (see Fig. 8-5), where “level 1” would indicate the over branching roadmap and “level 3” or “level 4” would indicate an individual technology roadmap.

Roadmap Overview

The working principle and architecture of in-space additive manufacturing is depicted in the below.

Overview Image.png

In-space additive manufacturing involves the fabrication, assembly, and integration of components beyond Earth’s atmosphere. Technologies in this area focus on fabricating a product with improved performance or reduced cost compared to existing Earth-fabricated products using manufacturing equipment with a rapid production rate, long life, and low size, weight, and power (SWaP). The additive manufacturing units use the layer-wise deposition of material to build up required component geometries. The energy source for the addition of material can either be mechanical, thermal, electrical, or chemical. For in-space additive manufacturing to prove viable, it must be possible to fabricate a variety of components in the required materials and geometries while meeting requirements on tolerances, surface roughness, and lead time. The reference case in the technology roadmap is the manufacturing of spare parts for a roundtrip Mars mission.

Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation

Level 1 DSM - In Space Additive Manufacturing.jpeg
Legend Guide And Tiered Interactions.jpeg

Zero Gravity Additive Manufacturing (2ZGAM) is part of an umbrella of In-Space Manufacturing (1ISM) techniques which includes In-Space Surface Manufacturing as well. Due to the nature of zero gravity mechanics, techniques such as Stereolithography & Digital Light Processing (Vat Polymerization) cannot be used and are not captured in this first-level DSM. 2ZGAM requires the following key enabling technologies at the process level: 3FDM Fused Deposition Modeling, 3MJ Material Jetting, 3NPJ NanoParticle Jetting, 3BJ Binder Jetting, 3MJF Multi Jet Fusion, 3SLS Selective Laser Sintering, 3DMLS Direct Metal Laser Sintering, 3EBM Electron Beam Melting, 3UAM Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing, 3LENS Laser Engineering Net Shape, and 3EBAM Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing. In turn, these require enabling technologies at level 4, the material component level: 4CMP Composites, 4PLA Plastics, and 4MET Metals.

Roadmap Model using OPM

We provide an Object-Process-Diagram (OPD) of the 2ZGAM roadmap in the figure below. This diagram captures the main object of the roadmap (In-Space Additive Manufacturing Unit), its various instances including development projects, its decomposition into subsystems (build plate, manufacturing head, stepper motors …), its characterization by Figures of Merit (FOMs) as well as the main processes (Configuring, Depositing).

OPD Assignment2.png


An Object-Process-Language (OPL) description of the roadmap scope is auto-generated and given below. It reflects the same content as the previous figure, but in a formal natural language.

OPL Assignment2.png

Figures of Merit

The table below show a list of FOMs by which solar electric aircraft can be assessed. The first four (shown in bold) are used to assess the aircraft itself. They are very similar to the FOMs that are used to compare traditional aircraft which are propelled by fossil fuels, the big difference being that 2SEA is essentially emissions free during flight operations. The other rows represent subordinated FOMs which impact the performance and cost of solar electric aircraft but are provided as outputs (primary FOMs) from lower level roadmaps at level 3 or level 4, see the DSM above.

FOM Image.PNG

Alignment with Company Strategic Drivers

Positioning of Company vs. Competition

Technical Model

Financial Model

List of R&T Projects and Prototypes

Key Publications, Presentations and Patents

Technology Strategy Statement