Difference between revisions of "Autonomous Mobile Robots for Enhancing Warehouse Logistics"
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
[[File:AMRs3.png| | [[File:AMRs3.png|1000px|left]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
| Kiva/Amazon Robotics || DU 1000 || 2006 || 450 || 0.14 || 3,333 || 110 || 4.09 || 1.39 || | | Kiva/Amazon Robotics || DU 1000 || 2006 || 450 || 0.14 || 3,333 || 110 || 4.09 || 1.39 || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Kiva/Amazon Robotics || The Hercules || 2017 || 567 || || 340 || 1.67 || | | Kiva/Amazon Robotics || The Hercules || 2017 || 567 || || 340 || 1.67 |||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Kiva/Amazon Robotics || The Pegasus || 2018 || 560 || 0.09 || 6,550 || 60 || 9.33 || | | Kiva/Amazon Robotics || The Pegasus || 2018 || 560 || 0.09 || 6,550 || 60 || 9.33 |||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Kiva/Amazon Robotics || Titan || 2023 || 1,134 || || || | | Kiva/Amazon Robotics || Titan || 2023 || 1,134 || || |||||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Kiva/Amazon Robotics || Atlas || 2014 || 340 || || || | | Kiva/Amazon Robotics || Atlas || 2014 || 340 || || |||||||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Zebra Robotics || Fetch 100 Flex || 2020 || 75 || 0.48 || 154 || 91 || 0.83 || 1.74 || 9 | | Zebra Robotics || Fetch 100 Flex || 2020 || 75 || 0.48 || 154 || 91 || 0.83 || 1.74 || 9 | ||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
| Rockwell Automation || Otto 1500 || 2015 || 1,900 || 0.82 || 2,305 || 820 || 2.32 || 2.00 || 10 | | Rockwell Automation || Otto 1500 || 2015 || 1,900 || 0.82 || 2,305 || 820 || 2.32 || 2.00 || 10 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| GreyOrange || Ranger Uplift || 2024 || 1,000 || 0.41 || 2,426 || || 2.00 || | | GreyOrange || Ranger Uplift || 2024 || 1,000 || 0.41 || 2,426 || || 2.00 |||| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Konica Minolta || MiR100 || 2015 || 100 || 0.18 || 553 || 65 || 1.54 || 1.50 || 10 | | Konica Minolta || MiR100 || 2015 || 100 || 0.18 || 553 || 65 || 1.54 || 1.50 || 10 | ||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
| Konica Minolta || MiR500 || 2018 || 500 || 0.40 || 1,258 || 230 || 2.17 || 2.00 || 8 | | Konica Minolta || MiR500 || 2018 || 500 || 0.40 || 1,258 || 230 || 2.17 || 2.00 || 8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Konica Minolta || MiR1000 Pallet Lifter || 2019 || 1,000 || 1.77 || 564 || || || 8 | | Konica Minolta || MiR1000 Pallet Lifter || 2019 || 1,000 || 1.77 || 564 || || || 8|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Konica Minolta || MiR250 || 2020 || 250 || 0.14 || 1,796 || 94 || 2.66 || 2.00 || 20 | | Konica Minolta || MiR250 || 2020 || 250 || 0.14 || 1,796 || 94 || 2.66 || 2.00 || 20 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Konica Minolta || MiR1200 Pallet Jack || 2024 || 1,200 || 3.15 || 381 || || 1.50 || 8 | | Konica Minolta || MiR1200 Pallet Jack || 2024 || 1,200 || 3.15 || 381 || || 1.50 || 8|| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Scallog || Boby || 2021 || 600 || 0.29 || 2,051 || 150 || 4.00 || 1.50 || 14 | | Scallog || Boby || 2021 || 600 || 0.29 || 2,051 || 150 || 4.00 || 1.50 || 14 |
Revision as of 17:27, 31 October 2024
Roadmap Overview
Warehouses are dynamic environments that have evolved into automated facilities designed to process, store, and ship products to customers around the world. These facilities play a key role in the logistics and supply chain networks for large-scale businesses. To meet the growing demands for speed and accuracy of today’s shipping expectations, significant advancements have been made to improve security, inventory management, storage optimization, climate control, and people management in warehouses. Figure 1 provides an overview of the basic processes that occur within a warehouse and points out some of the areas robotics are used to streamline product movement through the warehouse and enhance operational efficiency.
A lot of technology has been developed over the last several decades to optimize logistics and advance the operations within a warehouse. One of the largest challenges warehouses face is how to lift and transport heavy materials. Before the 1950s, this was primarily done through the use of carts on fixed rail systems or vehicles operated by humans. While these solutions helped to solve the transport problem, they introduced new issues around maintenance and fixed infrastructure as well as safety and training for employees and operators. In the 1950s, automated guided vehicles (AGVs) were introduced to warehouses. These vehicles were able to transport materials without the need for an operator, but still required the installation of a mechanism to guide the vehicles along a specified path. Initially, the guide was a set of wires that induced a magnetic field that would propel a cart along its path. This quickly evolved to utilize magnetic tape, optical strips, and eventually laser guidance. These systems are still in use today and provide a reliable mechanism to transport goods around a warehouse; however, they don't have the adaptability and intelligence needed for modern warehouse operations [4].
While AGVs were evolving, so was the field of robotics, specifically autonomous mobile robots (AMRs). AMRs are a class of robots that have the ability to sense their surroundings and intelligently navigate a dynamic environment to accomplish a task [5]. The first set of AMRs were developed by William Grey Walter in the 1940s and 1950s. He developed two robots named Elmer and Elsie for use in neurophysiology research. These robots were equipped with light and touch sensors, and eventually included the ability to sense sound and move around. Between the 1950s and 1990s, AMRs continued to evolve, but were primarily used in research and academia. The HelpMate was the first AMR that was commercially available. This robot was released in the 1990s and featured Sonar, infrared, and vision systems. The HelpMate was used to transport materials around medical facilities [3]. Now, companies like Amazon Robotics (formerly Kiva Systems) and inVia are developing advanced robotics to facilitate dynamic operations within a warehouse while reducing safety incidents and increasing productivity.
In this roadmap, we will attempt to address and characterize a technology aimed at reducing warehouse complexity in three key areas – storage optimization, product movement, and people management.
There are several different types of robots that are currently in use or being developed for warehouses today. Each type of robot has a specific function or a few specific functions within a warehouse. Table 1 provides an overview of the primary robots in use today.
Type | Use Case | High Level Technologies |
---|---|---|
Robotic Arms | Loading or picking up boxes | * End-of-arm tools * Vacuum grippers * Joint actuators * Computer vision * Cameras * Sensors * Controller * Power systems |
Packaging Robots | Packing and sealing boxes | * Boxing robotics * Labeling mechanics |
Verification Robots | Scanning products and/or packages | * 3D scanners * Barcode/QR scanners |
Autonomous Mobile Robots | * Lift and transport goods to humans * Optimize storage patterns |
* LiDAR * Sensors * Digital Twins * Machine Learning * Optimization algorithms * Communications systems * Motor * Battery systems |
Autonomous mobile robots and their use within warehouse systems will be the primary focus for our roadmap. These devices combine several advanced technologies to transport goods without the assistance of humans or guides. They help to reduce safety incidents, increase picking rates, and increase fulfillment rates within warehouses. Throughout the rest of this roadmap, we will do a comprehensive review of AMRs and their enabling technologies.
Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation
We present here the DSM allocation of autonomous mobile robots and its tree. The company-wide initiative of warehouse automation is supported by the order management system, the inventory management system, and warehouse robots. Warehouse robots can be classified into autonomous mobile robots, robotic arms, packaging robots, and verification robots. We focus on the autonomous mobile robot for this roadmap, which is enabled by level 4 technologies in light blue, such as 3D mapping, digital twins, and route optimation algorithms. The DSM shows coupling between technologies; for example, the development of the lifter module is dependent on the performance of sensors, the controller, and the battery system.
Roadmap Model using OPM
The OPM for warehouse automation and the role of autonomous mobile robots is shown below. In preparation for warehouse operations, inbound delivery to the warehouse is unloaded and stored in inventory shelves that are carried by AMRs. When a customer purchases a product on the e-commerce website, the order management system assigns an order to the warehouse, which initiates the picking and packaging processes: AMRs carry themselves to the fulfillment associate who picks the purchased products, packaging robots assist the fulfillment associate in packaging, packages are transported on conveyor belts as they are verified (scanned) by verification robots, and finally the outbound packages are loaded onto trucks by robotic arms and shipped out as outbound delivery. Throughout the process, the inventory management system tracks the inventory in the warehouse at the unloading, picking, and loading stages.
Figures of Merit (FOM)
Below are key FOMs for autonomous mobile robots. Payload capacity, speed, and picking rate are FOMs that contribute to the efficiency of warehouse automation. Continuous operation time and failure rate determine the robustness of AMRs. Volume of AMR can also be a competitive metric as AMRs operate in warehouses that are limited in space. Learning time indicates the time it takes to train the AMR in a digital twin before deploying them into the physical warehouse.
Figure of Merit (FOM) | Unit | Description | Trend |
---|---|---|---|
Payload Capacity | [kg] | Total weight the AMR can carry (including items and shelves) | Increasing |
Speed | [m/s] | Average speed of the AMR while carrying shelves inside the warehouse | Increasing |
Volume | [m^3] | Volume of AMR (width x length x height) | Decreasing |
Continuous Operation Time | [hrs] | Total time the AMR can operate in one full charge | Increasing |
Picking Rate | [units / hr] | Number of units the AMR can assist the fulfillment associate to pick per hour | Increasing |
Failure Rate | [times/ hr] | Number of times the AMR fails per hour | Decreasing |
Learning Time | [hrs] | Total time it takes to train the AMR to operate in a warehouse | Undetermined |
Following is the trend of payload capacity for AMRs by various manufacturers developed since 2006, where we can see a steady improvement in performance.
Alignment with Company Strategic Drivers
Positioning of Company vs. Competition
Company | Robot | Date Released | Load Capacity (kg) | Volume (m^3) | Load Capacity / Volume (kg/m^3) | Weight (kg) | Load Capacity / Weight | Speed (m/s) | Battery Life (hr) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kiva/Amazon Robotics | DU 1000 | 2006 | 450 | 0.14 | 3,333 | 110 | 4.09 | 1.39 | |
Kiva/Amazon Robotics | The Hercules | 2017 | 567 | 340 | 1.67 | ||||
Kiva/Amazon Robotics | The Pegasus | 2018 | 560 | 0.09 | 6,550 | 60 | 9.33 | ||
Kiva/Amazon Robotics | Titan | 2023 | 1,134 | ||||||
Kiva/Amazon Robotics | Atlas | 2014 | 340 | ||||||
Zebra Robotics | Fetch 100 Flex | 2020 | 75 | 0.48 | 154 | 91 | 0.83 | 1.74 | 9 |
Zebra Robotics | Fetch 100 Connect | 2023 | 57 | 0.15 | 375 | 74 | 0.77 | 1.50 | 9 |
Zebra Robotics | Fetch100 Shelf | 2021 | 78 | 0.48 | 161 | 91 | 0.86 | 1.75 | 9 |
Rockwell Automation | Otto 100 | 2015 | 150 | 0.13 | 1,173 | 93 | 1.61 | 2.00 | 6 |
Rockwell Automation | Otto 600 | 2022 | 600 | 0.24 | 2,551 | 290 | 2.07 | 1.40 | |
Rockwell Automation | Otto 1200 | 2023 | 1,200 | 0.39 | 3,053 | 4,200 | 0.29 | 1.50 | |
Rockwell Automation | Otto 1500 | 2015 | 1,900 | 0.82 | 2,305 | 820 | 2.32 | 2.00 | 10 |
GreyOrange | Ranger Uplift | 2024 | 1,000 | 0.41 | 2,426 | 2.00 | |||
Konica Minolta | MiR100 | 2015 | 100 | 0.18 | 553 | 65 | 1.54 | 1.50 | 10 |
Konica Minolta | MiR200 | 2017 | 200 | 0.18 | 1,107 | 65 | 3.08 | 1.50 | 10 |
Konica Minolta | MiR500 | 2018 | 500 | 0.40 | 1,258 | 230 | 2.17 | 2.00 | 8 |
Konica Minolta | MiR1000 Pallet Lifter | 2019 | 1,000 | 1.77 | 564 | 8 | |||
Konica Minolta | MiR250 | 2020 | 250 | 0.14 | 1,796 | 94 | 2.66 | 2.00 | 20 |
Konica Minolta | MiR1200 Pallet Jack | 2024 | 1,200 | 3.15 | 381 | 1.50 | 8 | ||
Scallog | Boby | 2021 | 600 | 0.29 | 2,051 | 150 | 4.00 | 1.50 | 14 |
Technical Model
Key Publications, Presentations, and Patents
The following are a representative set of patents that have contributed to the overall development of AMRs:
1. Patient #US 7,402,018 B2 – Inventory System with Mobile Drive Unit and Inventory Holder
2. Patient #US 7,873,469 B2– System and Method for Maneuvering a Mobile Drive Unit
3. Martins, V. F., Silva, F. J. G., & Monteiro, F. (2021). A Digital Twin Approach for the Improvement of an Autonomous Mobile Robot's (AMR) Operating Environment: A Case Study. Retrieved October 29, 2024, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356528334
References
[1] Azadeh, K., de Koster, R., & Roy, D. (n.d.). Material flow in a typical automated warehouse [Figure 1]. In Robotized and Automated Warehouse Systems: Review and Recent Developments. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2977779:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}.
[2] Conveyco. (n.d.). Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) [Image]. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://www.conveyco.com/technology/autonomous-mobile-robots-amrs/
[3] Goodwin, D. (2020, September 9). The evolution of autonomous mobile robots. Control. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://control.com/technical-articles/the-evolution-of-autonomous-mobile-robots/
[4] inVia Robotics. (n.d.). Autonomous warehouse robots: A brief history. Retrieved October 9, 2024, from https://inviarobotics.com/blog/autonomous-warehouse-robots-brief-history/
[5] Raj, R., & Kos, A. (2022). A comprehensive study of mobile robot: History, developments, applications, and future research perspectives. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 6951. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12146951
Figure 5:
[1] AllAboutLean.com. (n.d.). *The Amazon robotics family: Kiva, Pegasus, Xanthus, and more...* All About Lean. https://www.allaboutlean.com/amazon-robotics-family/
[2] Amazon. (n.d.). *The story behind Amazon's next generation robot*. About Amazon. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/operations/the-story-behind-amazons-next-generation-robot
[3] Amazon. (n.d.). *Amazon robotics unveils Titan, new fulfillment center robot*. About Amazon. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/operations/amazon-robotics-unveils-titan-new-fulfillment-center-robot
[4] Zebra Technologies. (n.d.). *Fetch100 Flex*. [Brochure]. Zebra Technologies. https://www.zebra.com
[5] Zebra Technologies. (n.d.). *Robotics automation brochure portfolio*. [Brochure]. Zebra Technologies. https://www.zebra.com
[6] OTTO Motors. (n.d.). *OTTO 100 autonomous mobile robot*. Rockwell Automation. https://ottomotors.com
[7] OTTO Motors. (n.d.). *OTTO 600 autonomous mobile robot*. Rockwell Automation. https://ottomotors.com
[8] OTTO Motors. (n.d.). *OTTO 1200 autonomous mobile robot*. Rockwell Automation. https://ottomotors.com
[9] OTTO Motors. (n.d.). *OTTO 1500 autonomous mobile robot*. Rockwell Automation. https://ottomotors.com
[10] GreyOrange. (n.d.). *Intralogistics (IL) AMR*. https://www.greyorange.com
[11] Hartfiel Automation. (n.d.). *MiR100 mobile robot*. https://shop.hartfiel.com/products/MiR100%20Mobile%20Robot
[12] Hartfiel Automation. (n.d.). *MiR200 mobile robot*. https://shop.hartfiel.com/products/MiR200%20Mobile%20Robot
[13] Hartfiel Automation. (n.d.). *MiR500 mobile robot*. https://shop.hartfiel.com/products/MiR500%20Mobile%20Robot
[14] Hartfiel Automation. (n.d.). *MiR1000 pallet lifter*. https://shop.hartfiel.com/products/MiR1000%20Pallet%20Lifter
[15] Mobile Industrial Robots. (n.d.). *MiR250*. https://mobile-industrial-robots.com/products/robots/mir250
[16] Mobile Industrial Robots. (n.d.). *MiR1200 pallet jack*. https://mobile-industrial-robots.com/products/robots/mir1200-pallet-jack
[17] Scallog. (n.d.). *Logistics robot for autonomous product movement*. https://www.scallog.com