Variable Emissivity Materials For Spacecraft

From MIT Technology Roadmapping
Revision as of 15:36, 10 October 2024 by Achipps (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Technology Roadmap Sections and Deliverables

  • 4VEM - Variable Emissivity Materials for Spacecraft

Thermochromic variable emissivity materials (VEMs) can be used for a wide range of applications, from spacecraft radiators to windows used on Earth. For this technology roadmap, the use of VEMs for spacecraft radiators will be the focus.

Roadmap Overview

The only way that orbiting spacecraft can reject heat is through radiation. Because of this, the thermo-optical properties of spacecraft radiators are important. The thermo-optical properties of radiators, such as emissivity, determine how much heat is radiated away.

There is a way to calculate how much heat is radiated from a surface, and it is shown in the equation below. Q is heat being radiated away from a surface, A is the area of the radiating surface, σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, ε is the emissivity of the surface material, and T is the temperature of the surface.

Q=A\sigma\varepsilon T^4

The emissivity of a material is directly proportional to the heat radiated away. So, when a material has high emissivity, more heat is radiated away. Most materials have a constant emissivity, but there are some materials whose emissivity can change based on environmental conditions or whether they are powered. These materials are called variable emissivity materials (VEMs).

There are active (electrochromic) and passive (thermochromic) VEMs. Electrochromic VEMs require power input to change emissivity, unlike thermochromic VEMs which change their emissivity based on their temperature. The technology of thermochromic VEMs whose emissivity is lower at low temperatures and higher at high temperatures is expected to be widely used in radiators for spacecraft, because compared to constant-emissivity radiators, it reduces spacecraft heater power requirements and temperature swings, all without power or human input. Figure 1 shows how a thermochromic VEM can help spacecraft more efficiently manage their temperature.

HowVEMsAffectSpacecraft.png

Figure 1: Diagram of how VEMs affect spacecraft, from [1]

This roadmap will explore how thermochromic VEMs have evolved, their Figures of Merit, and what is expected in the future.

Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation

Figure 2 below shows the interactions between various technologies and the 4VEM variable emissivity technology. The x's in the matrix signify interaction.

DSMmatrixVEMsActuallyCorrect.png

Figure 2: DSM Matrix

VEMs are part of a larger technology tree, with the 1st level being the technology of a general spacecraft:

  • 1SPC Spacecraft

The 1SPC Spacecraft technology has a variety of subsystem technologies; all of the subsystems of a spacecraft interact with each other and make the spacecraft work, and they make up the second level:

  • 2STR Structures Subsystem
  • 2POW Power Subsystem
  • 2CDH Command and Data Handling Subsystem
  • 2ADC Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem
  • 2PAY Payload Subsystem
  • 2PRO Propulsion Subsystem
  • 2COM Communication Subsystem
  • 2THE Thermal Subsystem.

VEMs are part of the 2THE thermal subsystem of a spacecraft. There are many technologies that are used for spacecraft thermal subsystems, and they are in the 3rd level:

  • 3HEP Heat Pipes
  • 3LOU Louvers
  • 3HEA Heaters
  • 3CRY Cryocoolers
  • 3PCM Phase-change materials
  • 3TIM Thermal interface materials
  • 3RAD Radiators

VEMs are used in the 3RAD Radiators technology. The 3RAD technology can be split into two groups as well, which comprise the 4th level:

  • 4CEM Constant emissivity materials used for radiators
  • 4VEM Variable emissivity materials used for radiators.

So, VEMs are a small part of the whole spacecraft technology. Figure 3 below shows where the 4VEM technology is inside a tree.

DSMtreeVEMs.png

Figure 3: 4VEM Technology Tree Placement


Roadmap Model using OPM

The Object-Process Diagram (OPD) and Object-Process Language (OPL) represented in Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively, were generated by OPCloud. This model describes the processes and Figures of Merit (FOM) involved with passive spacecraft VEMs, as well as their object interactions. It highlights the thermochromic VEMs discussed in this roadmap, which require no electrical energy to operate.

VEMOPM.png

Figure 4: VEM OPD

VEMOPL.png

Figure 5: VEM OPL

Figures of Merit (FOM)

There are several Figures of Merit (FOMs) that describe VEMs. In order to describe the FOMs, an emissivity vs. temperature graph of several VEMs made from vanadium dioxide doped with tungsten will be shown in Figure 7, which is from [1].

The below table presents the FOM that can be used to evaluate various VEMs.

Figure of Merit Units Description
Temperature Hysteresis (\Delta T_{hys} ) [K] This describes how large hysteresis is for the VEM, and it is a difference of temperatures. The smaller the quantity, the better. The nominal value is 0 Kelvin (or 0 degrees Celsius).
Minimum Emissivity (\epsilon_L ) [-] This is the minimum emissivity of a VEM. The nominal value is 0.
Maximum Emissivity (\epsilon_H ) [-] This is the maximum emissivity of a VEM. The nominal value is 1.
Emissivity Range (\Delta\epsilon_H ) [-] This is the difference between the maximum and minimum emissivities of VEMs. The nominal value is 1.
Lifetime (n ) [Cycles] This is the number of emissivity state switches the material can undergo before failure. The higher this value, the better the VEM.
Response Time (t ) [s] This is the amount of time it takes for the device to switch between different emissivity states. The lower the response time, the better the thermal control.

Figure 8 displays a diverse spread of variability in emissivity ranges for active and passive types of modern VEMs over time using data from [2] and [3], which also include the specific VEM technologies plotted. The distribution of the emissivity ranges is a reminder that emissivity range may not necessarily be the most important figure of merit for a specific VEM application, hence why there is not a clear upward trend in the data over time. Although the data is very disperse, linear regression models were applied, and they show an improvement for electrochromic and thermochromic VEMs of 0.02/year and 0.03/year, respectively. Due to physics principles, the theoretical emissivity range for a given material is 1, with the maximum emissivity being 1 and the minimum being 0. This cannot exceed 1 due to the law of conservation of energy. That it, an object cannot emit more than 100% of its energy. In terms of application to passive spacecraft thermal control, thermochromic VEMs are at the incubation stage of the technology lifecycle due to only one VEM technology, Thermal Control Tiles designed by MPB Communications, being sent to space [4][5]. However, there are initiatives for other thermochromic VEMs to be sent to space in the near future by the Air Force Research Laboratory [6].

VEMEmissivityRange.png

Figure 8: Modern VEM Emissivity Ranges with Data Adapted from [2] and [3]

Sources

[1] I. Foster, "Variable Emissivity Materials for Thermal Radiators: Introduction to Characterizing Thermochromic Infrared Surfaces in Space," in AIAA SciTech 2024 Forum, 2024. https://arc-aiaa-org.libproxy.mit.edu/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2024-1295

[2] https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.T6555

[3] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101198

[4] https://umstarlab.ca/index.php/past-projects/

[5] https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/items/4b815052-4a4a-4031-9624-48605cae9c89

[6] https://afresearchlab.com/technology/space-power-beaming/