Selective Laser Sintering

From MIT Technology Roadmapping
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Roadmap Overview

3D printing, or additive manufacturing, is a disruptive innovation transforming traditional manufacturing. Unlike subtractive methods, which remove material from a large block, 3D printing builds parts layer by layer, creating intricate designs previously impossible to manufacture. This technology has significantly reduced the time and complexity involved in assembly, allowing parts to be made on demand without sourcing from distant suppliers. By streamlining the prototyping process, 3D printing accelerates innovation and lowers costs, enhancing customer satisfaction and reducing product development waste. This technology has also changed cost structures in manufacturing by eliminating the need for large-scale, non-recurring investments in molds, tools, and setups. Industries such as aerospace, automotive, and healthcare have benefited from 3D printing's ability to produce lightweight, complex designs, like Pratt & Whitney's Geared Turbo Fan engine components and GE's 3D-printed fuel nozzles. With its potential to minimize waste and support sustainability, 3D printing continues to disrupt supply chains and enable mass customization across various sectors.

3Dprinter SLS.jpg


Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation

DSM SLS.png


Roadmap Model using OPM

We provide an Object-Process-Diagram (OPD) of the 2SLS roadmap in the figure below (Fig.4-1). This diagram captures the main object of the roadmap (SLS 3D printing), its various instances that are famous in the industry, its decomposition into subsystems (laser unit, supply container, bed plate system …), its characterization by Figures of Merit (FOMs) as well as the main 3D printing processes (modeling, printing, post-processing).

OPD SLS.jpg

An Object-Process-Language (OPL) description of the roadmap scope is auto-generated and given below.

OPL SLS.jpg

Figures of Merit

The below shows a list of FOMs by which SLS 3D printing can be assessed. Since we focus on applying this technology to industry, cost, time, and precision are critical factors.

FOM SLS.jpg

Alignment with Company Strategic Drivers

The table below shows an example of potential strategic drivers and alignment of the 2SLS technology roadmap with it.

Positioning of Company vs. Competition

The table below compiles information on SLS 3D printers from leading 3D printer manufacturers. Confidential information has been left blank. The tradespace for unit cost and build speed, using valid data, is shown below.

SLS 3Dprinter.png
Trade space between Unit price and build rate.png

Technical Model

The build rate is a critical Figure of Merit (FOM) for the productivity of 3D printers. However, there is no general model formula that expresses the build rate in laser sintering-based 3D printing. The build rate is influenced by factors such as layer thickness, laser spot size, laser scanning speed, and powder material properties. In some cases, the build rate has improved through software optimizations, such as optimizing the scanning path. Enhancing material properties, for example, using materials that can be sintered at lower temperatures, would allow for faster scanning speeds while achieving proper sintering. These parameters interact with each other. For instance, reducing the spot size concentrates energy, which may affect layers beyond the specified thickness. Additionally, layer thickness, laser spot size, and laser scanning speed all impact the quality of the 3D-printed material (density, surface roughness). In practice, parameters must be set to balance build rate, quality, and cost. Given these complex mechanisms, we simplified the modeling of build rate by disregarding material-based constraints on laser spot size and laser scanning, creating the following straightforward mathematical model.



In addition, the following figure presents the trade space of unit printing cost of Alloy 718 using SLS. It shows how the printing cost varies with parameters including printing speed, powder cost as per particle size, and printer cost. The data points for different powder costs with different particle sizes are clustered for each different model of printers.

Trade space - 3D printing cost of Alloy 718.png

Financial Model

List of R&T Projects and Prototypes

Key Publications, Presentations and Patents

The 3D printing patent technology has been evolving rapidly. With the addition of regular new patents, technology is improving daily across various applications and technologies. Many patents have significantly helped in multiple biomedical, aerospace, and manufacturing applications and technologies. The patent applications in 3D/ Additive Manufacturing are growing at an average rate of 26% between 2001 and 2020. This speed is much higher other areas in the technology sector. A search results over USPTO shows that, many leading companies with leading 3D printing patent numbers.

Some Leading Patent Holders are listed below. • GE Aerospace (1,500+ patents and pending applications) • RTX Corporation (1,400+ patents and pending applications) • HP Inc. (1,000+ patents and pending applications) • Stratasys Ltd. (450+ patents and pending applications) • 3D Systems (400+ patents and pending applications)

The 3D printing Notable Recent Patents are: • HP's patents related to Multi Jet Fusion and Metal Jet technologies • 3D Systems' patents for "Thiol-Ene Inks for 3D Printing" and "Non-Isocyanate Polyurethane Inks for 3D Printing" • Boeing's patent for a platform combining levitated parts, multiple build heads, and variable orientations

Emerging Technologies with patents include patents related to 1) volumetric 3D printing, 2) for composite materials in 3D printing and 3) patents for quality assurance and online monitoring in metal 3D printing.

The early Fundamental Patents in 3D printing started with 3D Systems, which holds some of the earliest and most fundamental patents in 3D printing technology, including Chuck Hull's U.S. Patent No. 4,575,330 for stereolithography.

Chuck Hull's Stereolithography Patent, U.S. Patent No. 4,575,330 https://patents.google.com/patent/US4575330A/en One of the foundational patents in 3D printing technology is Scott Crump's Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Patent.

Scott Crump's Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,121,329 https://patents.google.com/patent/US5121329A/en

On Composite 3D Printing Patent, Northrop Grumman's Composite 3D Printing Patent. Northrop Grumman's Composite 3D Printing Patent: "Device and Method for 3D Printing with Long-Fiber Reinforcement" https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170144224A1/en