Difference between revisions of "Space electric propulsion"

From MIT Technology Roadmapping
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:


Electric thrusters typically use much less propellant than chemical rockets because they operate at a higher specific impulse than chemical rockets. Due to limited electric power the thrust is much weaker compared to chemical rockets, but electric propulsion can provide thrust for a longer time.
Electric thrusters typically use much less propellant than chemical rockets because they operate at a higher specific impulse than chemical rockets. Due to limited electric power the thrust is much weaker compared to chemical rockets, but electric propulsion can provide thrust for a longer time.
[[File:electric_propulsion.png|thumb|500p]]
[[File:electric_propulsion.png|thumb|Schematic Diagram of electric propulsion system]]





Revision as of 02:56, 12 October 2023

Electric Propulsion in Space

Roadmap Overview

Spacecraft electric propulsion uses electrostatic or electromagnetic fields to accelerate mass to high speed and thus generate thrust to modify the velocity of a spacecraft in orbit. This method leverages the charge/mass ratio of propellants, with relatively small potential differences potentially generating high exhaust velocities. This reduces the amount of reaction mass or propellant required, but increases the amount of specific power required compared to chemical rockets.

Electric thrusters typically use much less propellant than chemical rockets because they operate at a higher specific impulse than chemical rockets. Due to limited electric power the thrust is much weaker compared to chemical rockets, but electric propulsion can provide thrust for a longer time.

Schematic Diagram of electric propulsion system


Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Allocation

Roadmap Model using OPM

Figures of Merit